[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5cbaf84c191b9a3e3cb26545c808d208bdbf2ab5 commit r13-3273-g5cbaf84c191b9a3e3cb26545c808d208bdbf2ab5 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|linkw at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Aha, so the issue is that we have a vectorized epilogue here and the epilogue of _that_ ends up doing [local count: 94607391]: # sum0_48 = PHI # sum1_47 = PHI # sum2_46 = PHI # sum3_45 =

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- A bit reduced test-case that can be compiled with cross compiler: $ cat pr107160.c #define N 16 float fl[N]; __attribute__ ((noipa, optimize (0))) void init () { for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) fl[i] =

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 13 Oct 2022, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 > > --- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin --- > > > > Btw, I've fixed a SLP reduction issue

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #11 from Kewen Lin --- > > > Btw, I've fixed a SLP reduction issue two days ago in > > > r13-3226-gee467644c53ee2 > > > though that looks unrelated? > > > > Thanks for the information, I'll double check it. > > To rebase to

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 13 Oct 2022, linkw at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 > > --- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin --- > > > > The above doesn't look wrong (but may

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #9 from Kewen Lin --- > > The above doesn't look wrong (but may miss the rest of the IL). On > x86_64 this looks like > >[local count: 105119324]: > # sum0_41 = PHI > # sum1_39 = PHI > # sum2_37 = PHI > # sum3_35 =

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #7) > One reduced test case is: > > > > #include > #include > > #define N 128 > float fl[N]; > >

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-13 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-12 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-10 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #5 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I added that option and 554.roms_r now runs OK.

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-09 Thread linkw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Note that 554.roms_r from spec2017 also fails after this commit.

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-06 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- One of the compilation commands: /home/seurer/gcc/git/install/gcc-test/bin/g++ -c -o auto_derivative_function.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -Iinclude -DBOOST_DISABLE_THREADS -Ddeal_II_dimension=3 -m64

[Bug target/107160] [13 regression] r13-2641-g0ee1548d96884d causes verification failure in spec2006

2022-10-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107160 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---