https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107259
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-*-*
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The question is whether the backend should announce "VL" support and fixup
using masks transparently?
The vectorizer at the moment would require a fully masked loop (it doesn't
support the special case of loop vectorizing just the "last" iteration as
masked). The SLP vectorizer does not consider using masked larger vectors
either.
