https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7c4dfb5989e80ffc8e8439a8d9a9ed654612b90
commit r12-9608-gc7c4dfb5989e80ffc8e8439a8d9a9ed654612b90
Author: Stam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:79431d45e2c25dc8608c8ddc6d2798dbcb79650a
commit r12-9559-g79431d45e2c25dc8608c8ddc6d2798dbcb79650a
Author: Stam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8a1360e72d6c6056606aa5edd8c906c50f26de59
commit r13-5200-g8a1360e72d6c6056606aa5edd8c906c50f26de59
Author: Stam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #9 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
> Clearly Helium+Linux on Godbolt is a bit confused
Yea, I agree -- it still shouldn't be an unintuitive front-end type clash
error, though!
I've posted another patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Bracey ---
I'm only testing on the Linux trunk because it's what Godbolt has. If it has
bare-metal, I'm not seeing it.
Actual real development system is bare-metal using Arm's embedded GCC releases,
and I don't have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #7 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
(In reply to Kevin Bracey from comment #6)
> Retesting the Godbolt on trunk, it's now worse - every line produces
> multiple not-very-informative errors:
>
> source>:7:9: error: '_Generic'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Bracey ---
Retesting the Godbolt on trunk, it's now worse - every line produces multiple
not-very-informative errors:
source>:7:9: error: '_Generic' specifies two compatible types
7 | x = vmulq(x, 0.5); // ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrea Corallo :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fefb8931d566cc8a4cbba81601972b0d2002f95
commit r13-4332-g2fefb8931d566cc8a4cbba81601972b0d2002f95
Author: Stam Markianos-Wright
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Bracey ---
Yes, looking at them it seems clear those patches address what I'm seeing with
the `vmulq(x, 6)` issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Bracey ---
I've just spotted another apparent generic selection problem in my reproducer
for bug 107714 - should I create a new issue for it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107515
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |stammark at gcc dot
13 matches
Mail list logo
