https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Earnshaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddc9b5ee13cd686c8674f92d46045563c06a23ea
commit r13-7114-gddc9b5ee13cd686c8674f92d46045563c06a23ea
Author: Richard Earnshaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
--- Comment #3 from Stam Markianos-Wright ---
Thank you, Andre for fixing the Part 1 in this ticket :)
The part 2 we've found to be a regression since r13-416-g485a0ae0982abe and is
also the reason why the mve_*_memory_nodes tests are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d45ec8a732f449647afa89e46b80a4e0614ec28d
commit r13-5647-gd45ec8a732f449647afa89e46b80a4e0614ec28d
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75b58e77706e8b5057770f040005950940a9a0f5
commit r13-5646-g75b58e77706e8b5057770f040005950940a9a0f5
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107674
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target
