https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:25edc76f2afba0b4eaf22174d42de042a6969dbe
commit r12-9038-g25edc76f2afba0b4eaf22174d42de042a6969dbe
Author: Stam Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08842ad274f5e2630994f7c6e70b2d31768107ea
commit r11-10461-g08842ad274f5e2630994f7c6e70b2d31768107ea
Author: Stam M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Stam Markianos-Wright
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4269a6567eb991e6838f40bda5be9e3a7972530c
commit r13-4935-g4269a6567eb991e6838f40bda5be9e3a7972530c
Author: Stam Markianos-W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Version|12.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Bracey ---
I had a look at the GCC source. The vld2/vst2/vld4/vst4 instructions in mve.md
have reused the "Um" constraint used for vld/vst in Neon, which permits
both "!" and register offset.
This needs to be tightened
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Bracey ---
The assembler's rejection of the vld2 is valid - the only permitted
post-indexed form is to use "!" for increment by 32 (the amount read).
Experimenting by changing "inStep" you can see the compiler backend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Stam Markianos-Wright changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-11-17
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
Kevin Bracey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stammark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107714
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Bracey ---
Looking at that assembly output from Compiler Explorer, I'm also at a loss as
to what happened to the "6" for the VMUL. Maybe something else to look at?
10 matches
Mail list logo