[Bug target/108853] Add new -mcpu=e500 alias for -mcpu=8540

2023-05-08 Thread pali at kernel dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108853 --- Comment #5 from Pali Rohár --- Back to the original question. Can gcc add a new option -mcpu=e500 as alias to -mcpu=8540 ?

[Bug target/108853] Add new -mcpu=e500 alias for -mcpu=8540

2023-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108853 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Pali Rohár from comment #3) > And due to this removal, LLVM and clang recently gained some usable e500v2 > implementation. I was told that it was heavily tested on FreeBSD with > desktop applica

[Bug target/108853] Add new -mcpu=e500 alias for -mcpu=8540

2023-02-21 Thread pali at kernel dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108853 --- Comment #3 from Pali Rohár --- I'm still using processors with e500 cores with recent Linux kernel versions and I know also other people who also still using them. Note that NXP still supports some QorIQ processors which have integrated e50

[Bug target/108853] Add new -mcpu=e500 alias for -mcpu=8540

2023-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108853 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- e500 support was mostly removed out of GCC too.

[Bug target/108853] Add new -mcpu=e500 alias for -mcpu=8540

2023-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108853 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Does anyone still use the e500 core? I thought the last SoC that had that core was years ago and even no longer supported by FreeScale/NXP.