https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aed51e2051b24a6a2127c6626f451641557a571a
commit r14-812-gaed51e2051b24a6a2127c6626f451641557a571a
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #10)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> > Fixed.
>
> I don't think so. The code I gave seems still to crash the compiler:
Yes, the cost function is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> Fixed.
I don't think so. The code I gave seems still to crash the compiler:
$ ~/gcc/results/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #9 from Uroš
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10a0d98356680a387b69f8659099450f7af86d9f
commit r14-713-g10a0d98356680a387b69f8659099450f7af86d9f
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #4)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #1)
> > > I further checked the reason, V2SI should never dropped into that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #1)
> > I further checked the reason, V2SI should never dropped into that function
> > because we have no pattern under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #1)
> I further checked the reason, V2SI should never dropped into that function
> because we have no pattern under V2SI.
>
> I suppose it is because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109807
--- Comment #1 from Haochen Jiang ---
I further checked the reason, V2SI should never dropped into that function
because we have no pattern under V2SI.
I suppose it is because -march=cascadelake will open SSE4.1, with the new
pattern, it
16 matches
Mail list logo
