[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56792|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56698|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #14 from Robin Dapp --- Yes, that's the culprit. I already pushed a fix yesterday.

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #12 from Robin Dapp --- Ok, on my server the difference is that I didn't add vext_spec=v1.0 to the qemu options. This caused the qemu diagnostic which would of course not match the expected output.

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #11 from Robin Dapp --- Verified they work locally but also fail on a different server. Also fail without vector and at -O0. Maybe it's different tcl versions or the shell doing wonky stuff?

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #10 from Robin Dapp --- I didn't yet look at all those closer because they are more dump failures than real execution failures. The ones I checked are expected "^foobar$" but got: "foobar" so I considered this rather an environmen

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #9 from JuzheZhong --- === gfortran: Unexpected fails for rv64gcv lp64d medany === FAIL: gfortran.dg/dollar_edit_descriptor_3.f -O0 output pattern test FAIL: gfortran.dg/dollar_edit_descriptor_3.f -O1 output pa

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56659|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 Patrick O'Neill changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #56615|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #5 from Patrick O'Neill --- I built all the zvl variants as a multilib. It seems like that caused them to interfere with eachother (potentially picking up the wrong glibc?). I'll rerun with separate runs & update the issues with upda

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #4 from Patrick O'Neill --- Investigating this now. I'll let you know what I find out. All these tests were run in the same environment so be wary when looking at any of them until I figure out the environment issue.

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp --- I cannot reproduce this either. Just started with binop/* and don't see any fails locally. Patrick, could you check what caused this?

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 JuzheZhong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai --- Comment #2

[Bug target/112583] RISC-V regression testsuite errors with rv64gcv_zvl128b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 --- Comment #1 from Patrick O'Neill --- Related issues: 128: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112583 256: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112597 512: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112598 1024: https://gcc.