https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
--- Comment #4 from Robin Dapp ---
Richard has posted it and asked for reviews. I have tested it and we have
several testsuite regressions with it but no severe ones. Most or all of them
are dump fails because we combine into vx variants that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
--- Comment #3 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #2)
> Yes, that's right.
It seems that I don't need to optimize it since we will eventually have
late-combine.
Could you tell what status of late-combine PASS ?
Will it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
--- Comment #2 from Robin Dapp ---
Yes, that's right.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113014
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
Richard S has a late combine PASS which is going to be merged in GCC-14.
Since we generate this following RTL int split1:
(insn 48 24 49 5 (set (reg:SI 149)
(const_int 0 [0])) -1
(nil))
(insn
