https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> That is fuzzy, because working as or ld can mean a lot of things. Latest
> binutils as/ld can be working, or 5 or 7 years old binutils as well. So
> what exactly we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is fuzzy, because working as or ld can mean a lot of things. Latest
binutils as/ld can be working, or 5 or 7 years old binutils as well. So what
exactly we mean by that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Should there be configure options, like
--with-working-gnu-as
--with-working-gnu-ld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I'm usually having cross assembler/linker around as they are easy to build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This usecase is only for GCC developers and it might even confuse regular
> users of GCC ...
True, such cross compilers are only for GCC developers. Regular won't run
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||internal-improvement
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113684
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
