[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2a060820c24724bb48ee006d257c449e4d94b72 commit r14-8831-gf2a060820c24724bb48ee006d257c449e4d94b72 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Feb 6

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > > Just the second hunk. I think with sorry call the compilation fails, so what > you actually emit doesn't matter (one can see it with -pipe, sure). Done.

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > Like this? > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > index f02c6c02ac6..ed0b0e19985 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc > +++

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Like this? diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc index f02c6c02ac6..ed0b0e19985 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc @@ -22785,10 +22785,10 @@

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #7) > This patch broke Solaris/x86 (i386-pc-solaris2.11) bootstrap: > > /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc: In function 'void >

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed for GCC 14 so far.

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51f8ac3341078303e81e72d9013698a31c5ddd29 commit r14-8808-g51f8ac3341078303e81e72d9013698a31c5ddd29 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Feb 1

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is at https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=30482

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Anyway, if flag_fentry == 0, it doesn't seem to be safe to clobber any registers to me, sure, the code could test if %r10 or %r11 are ever live in the current function (if that information is up to date at

[Bug target/113689] [11/12/13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fprofile -mcmodel=large when needing drap register since r11-6548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113689 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,