https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.2|14.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
--- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang ---
It seems that mainly caused by codesize increase in GCC14 since the actual
instruction retired increase ratio is similar to the regression.
Also, just like PR114987, I tried with GCC11, seems it gets the be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
--- Comment #4 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58142
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58142&action=edit
perf output of stress_vecwide_2048 for gcc-14 compiled code
perf output of stress_vecwide_2048 for gcc-14 com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
--- Comment #3 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58141
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58141&action=edit
perf output of stress_vecwide_2048 for gcc-13 compiled code
perf output of stress_vecwide_2048 for gcc-13 com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
--- Comment #2 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58140
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58140&action=edit
gcc-14 disassembly
gcc-14 disassembly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115002
--- Comment #1 from Colin Ian King ---
Created attachment 58139
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58139&action=edit
gcc-13 disassembly
gcc-13 disassembly