https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #28 from Sam James ---
Many thanks both.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #26 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5a26fc24b0af61498fae65ccad69d51d63d2a8b
commit r12-10623-gc5a26fc24b0af61498fae65ccad69d51d63d2a8b
Author: Uros Bizjak
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37bd7d5c4e17c97d2b7d50f630b1cf8b347a31f4
commit r13-8920-g37bd7d5c4e17c97d2b7d50f630b1cf8b347a31f4
Author: Uros Bizjak
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a963d441a68797956a5f67dcb351b2dbd4ac1d0
commit r14-10448-g3a963d441a68797956a5f67dcb351b2dbd4ac1d0
Author: Uros Bizjak
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0841fd4c42ab053be951b7418233f0478282d020
commit r15-2104-g0841fd4c42ab053be951b7418233f0478282d020
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #22 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #21)
> I think the instructions were for OP's benefit.
True ;)
@Maciej: I'd like to keep the testcase that also exercises the assembler,
because the error is best detecte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #21 from Sam James ---
I think the instructions were for OP's benefit.
Anyway, thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #20 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
Created attachment 58687
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58687&action=edit
Test case modified to use scan-assembler-times instead
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #17)
> (In r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #19 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
Sorry for the delay here, the machine I have access to is quite slow.
It spent ~2 days building unmodified git master and is now running the
testsuite as baseline...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLASG=alpha.exp=pr115526.c
s/RUNTESTFLASG/RUNTESTFLAGS/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #16)
> Can you please test this slightly cleaned up testcase?
Just put it in gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/alpha and do:
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLASG=alpha.exp=pr115526.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 58666
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58666&action=edit
Cleaned up testcase
Can you please test this slightly cleaned up testcase?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #15 from Maciej W. Rozycki ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> CC Maciej if he can test the patch on his Alpha system.
It takes about a day to complete and I had to rerun the libstdc++3
subdirectory due to an intermitte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> (In reply to Andreas K. Huettel from comment #11)
> > > Can someone please regression test the attached patch?
> >
> > More in a bit, but:
> Any progress with testi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andreas K. Huettel from comment #11)
> > Can someone please regression test the attached patch?
>
> More in a bit, but:
Any progress with testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #11 from Andreas K. Huettel ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #10)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> > Created attachment 58549 [details]
> > Proposed patch
>
> Can someone please regression test the attached pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> Created attachment 58549 [details]
> Proposed patch
Can someone please regression test the attached patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> Uros, is there any chance you'd be so kind to take a look?
I'm afraid that this is not some dead-simple issue that I can fix without the
access to the alpha machine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 fro
22 matches
Mail list logo
