--- Comment #12 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 19:37 ---
Fixed.
>From the patch mail:
The scan assembler check in gcc.dg/20020103-1.c is now XPASS for all powerpc
targets reported in the gcc-testresults archive. It started passing for
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu with -m3
--- Comment #11 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-12 19:36 ---
Subject: Bug 11594
Author: janis
Date: Fri Dec 12 19:34:48 2008
New Revision: 142718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=142718
Log:
PR target/11594
* gcc.dg/20020103-1.c: Remove XF
--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 18:12 ---
oops, sorry!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 17:53 ---
It doesn't show up as FAIL for powerpc*-*-linux* becaues that check includes an
xfail:
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "LC\[0-9\]" { xfail powerpc*-*-* } } } */
Reopened.
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org chan
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 14:57 ---
I don't see this FAIL in any recently reported test results (on the
gcc-testresults mainling list) for powerpc-linux or powerpc64-linux. Thus,
fixed.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2006-09-21 01:06
---
Subject: Re: testcase gcc.dg/20020103-1.c fails with "scan-assembler-not LC"
>
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-20
> 23:49 ---
> Does anyone know why we don
>
>
>
> --- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-20
> 23:49 ---
> Does anyone know why we don't run this test at lp64 on powerpc? I find that on
> powerpc-apple-darwin8 the following changes allow...
>
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32
--- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-09-20
23:49 ---
Does anyone know why we don't run this test at lp64 on powerpc? I find that on
powerpc-apple-darwin8 the following changes allow...
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'
dg.exp=2002
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|amodra at bigpond dot net |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|dot au
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 16:52 ---
As of mainline 20060417 the test is still failing on powerpc-linux, although it
passes for AIX and Darwin. Until December 2005 when Alan fixed the target
specifier, the test had not been run on powerpc64-linux with -m
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.5 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |3.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11594
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2004-01-16 19:24:35 |2004-11-26 05:49:38
date|
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-11-26
05:49 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00583.html
--
What|Removed |Added
K
15 matches
Mail list logo
