https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116145
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Since the SVE load doesn't support the full LO_SUM range, there is no hint
> that the address refers to invariant memory.
IA64 has a similar issue IIRC and the idea then was to use cselib more to find
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116145
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116145
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116145
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba730fd10934e4ca004251aa3748bf9da4d35e62
commit r15-2696-gba730fd10934e4ca004251aa3748bf9da4d35e62
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116145
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Suboptimal SVE immediate|SVE constant pool loads not
