--- Comment #9 from nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-05 14:28 ---
Hi Steven,
There is no longer a buf to fix. In fact the hack mentioned in comment #4
has been removed and the test case compiles without problems using the current
mainline sources.
Cheers
Nick
--
--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:23 ---
Reported as fixed, see comment #9.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:26 ---
Ping!
Nick, is there still a bug to fix here? The pattern you hacked in comment #4
is still not fixed AFAICT.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11738
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:27 ---
moving to WAITING pending Nick's reply.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pingc at nortelnetworks dot com 2004-12-08
12:18 ---
hi, additional comments
I encountered with a similar issue like this, my gcc version is 2.95.1 19990816.
It is interesting that when I commented some piece of my code, I could
successfully compiling my
