[Bug target/14625] tail call optimization missed

2005-01-31 Thread drepper at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-01-31 23:34 --- > /* If this function requires more stack slots than the current > function, we cannot change it into a sibling call. */ > || args_size.constant > current_function_args_size > > args_size.c

[Bug target/14625] tail call optimization missed

2005-01-31 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31 23:17 --- FWIW we don't emit the tail call because of this: /* If this function requires more stack slots than the current function, we cannot change it into a sibling call. */ || args_size.c

[Bug target/14625] tail call optimization missed

2005-01-31 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31 22:34 --- The code produced by CVS HEAD from today for the test case of comment #0 doesn't exactly get one thrilled and excited either: .file "t.c" .text .p2align 4,,15 .type