--- Additional Comments From ciceron at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08
17:03 ---
Mine.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ciceron at gcc
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08
17:42 ---
Subject: Bug 19051
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-08 17:42:45
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08
17:48 ---
Subject: Bug 19051
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-08 17:48:20
Modified files:
gcc:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08
17:52 ---
Subject: Bug 19051
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-08 17:52:23
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
--- Additional Comments From ciceron at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08
17:53 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|3.4.4 4.0.0 |3.4.3 4.0.0
Known to work||3.4.4 4.0.1 4.1.0
Target Milestone|---
--- Additional Comments From namsh at kldp dot org 2004-12-17 11:04 ---
I used m6811-elf-gccbug to report this bug. And I noticed
the gcc version is disappeared.
m6811-elf-gcc shows:
Release: 4.0.0 20041216 (experimental)
Why it changed to 0.0? Because of extra version string
like
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19051
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.4.4 4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19051
