--- Comment #8 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 16:43 ---
Subject: Bug 19061
Author: sje
Date: Fri Mar 3 16:43:43 2006
New Revision: 111678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=111678
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/26345
PR target/19061
*
--- Comment #9 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 16:45 ---
Subject: Bug 19061
Author: sje
Date: Fri Mar 3 16:45:47 2006
New Revision: 111679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=111679
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/26345
PR target/19061
*
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 17:33
---
Fixed in 4.1.1.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 04:55 ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01489.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 18:01
---
Created an attachment (id=10216)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10216action=view)
Testcase that fails at -O on every branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19061
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 18:03
---
That's a pretty serious issue (the testcase comes from Perl).
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 18:06
---
I think basereg_operand should not look inside SUBREGs. Here's an excerpt from
PA's deprecated basereg_operand:
return (GET_CODE (op) == REG
REG_POINTER (op)
register_operand (op,
--- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-11 18:06
---
Created an attachment (id=10217)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10217action=view)
Proposed fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19061
--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20 00:03
---
Confirmed with mainline and 3.4.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC host triplet||ia64-hp-hpux11.23
Summary|ia64-hp-hpux11.23 |IA64 GCC pointer confusion
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-18
00:12 ---
The program is correct, because you are still accessing a MGS object through a
MGS pointer, so GCC should not segfault here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19061
11 matches
Mail list logo
