[Bug target/20331] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code generation for the argument of the pure function in PIC

2005-03-09 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-09 23:58 --- I'm taking a look at the uses of MEM_READONLY_P, though I'm not sure which one has the similar issue. It looks that modified_in_p has the same problem with modified_between_p. BTW, it's better to change

[Bug target/20331] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code generation for the argument of the pure function in PIC

2005-03-08 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-08 21:58 --- (In reply to comment #1) I've traced what's going on: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00525.html It includes a patch for comment. The sh64 port is partcularily exposed in

[Bug target/20331] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code generation for the argument of the pure function in PIC

2005-03-06 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-07 00:20 --- I've traced what's going on: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00525.html It includes a patch for comment. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20331

[Bug target/20331] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code generation for the argument of the pure function in PIC

2005-03-05 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4/4.0/41 Regression] |[3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] |Wrong code generation for |Wrong code generation for

[Bug target/20331] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong code generation for the argument of the pure function in PIC

2005-03-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20331