[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.4.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20611

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-31 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-03-31 11:48 --- Fixed on 3.4, 4.0 and mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 11:46 --- Subject: Bug 20611 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-31 11:45:51 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 11:39 --- Subject: Bug 20611 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-31 11:39:34 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 11:34 --- Subject: Bug 20611 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-31 11:34:20 Modified files: gcc/config/rs6000: rs6000.md Log message: PR

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 11:33 --- Subject: Bug 20611 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-31 11:33:18 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/rs6000:

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-29 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-03-30 03:40 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02676.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-29 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |amodra at bigpond dot net |dot org |dot au Status|NEW

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29 19:15 --- I figured that this could be a bug in the mainline still. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-24 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-25 01:07 --- I found some code in the hot/cold partitioning patch that makes a difference even with -fno-reorder-blocks-and-partition and am testing it on the 3.4-branch. -- What|Removed

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-24 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 18:16 --- This was fixed as part of a gigantic patch: hot/cold partitioning in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-04/msg00348.html. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20611

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 01:23 --- I wonder if this is because we turned off something inbetween 3.4.0 and 4.0.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20611

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 00:30 --- I think the trick which I did for darwin and its pic label could be used here but I don't have time to fix this bug. See . -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-24 00:23 --- Ok, what is happening here is we are committing too early to a label name. There should be an easy way of fixing this. Note the problem shows up in .31.bbro which duplicates the BBs. This must likely

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 23:46 --- Though the code which generates the label is the same so it might be the tree-ssa merge after all. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20611

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 23:44 --- .LTLS0: Confirmed, I really doubt it was fixed by the tree-ssa merge. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug target/20611] duplicate label for inlined function referencing TLS

2005-03-23 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-23 23:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8438) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8438&action=view) minimized test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20611