[Bug target/20653] value too large for field on k6-2 (loop instruction)

2006-03-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-24 22:56 --- *** Bug 26856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20653] value too large for field on k6-2 (loop instruction)

2005-12-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 07:39 --- *** Bug 25574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20653] value too large for field on k6-2 (loop instruction)

2005-07-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 21:22 --- Fixed for sure on the mainline for 4.1.0 by removal of the loop instruction: 2005-06-05 Steven Bosscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] * config/i386/i386.c (x86_use_loop): Remove. * config/i386/i386.h

[Bug target/20653] value too large for field on k6-2 (loop instruction)

2005-03-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-27 16:36 --- Confirmed, there might be a testcase for 4.0.0 which can reproduce this too but I don't know of any. Anyways the problem looks like not taking into counting some alignment or something into the length so