[Bug target/21535] Empty inline assembly cause the generated code to be wrong?

2005-05-17 Thread yhlin at sdesigns dot com
--- Additional Comments From yhlin at sdesigns dot com 2005-05-17 20:44 --- Reading the output assembly twice, it's true that they are equivalent, it's just that the div is run in the branch delay slot of bnez in the firt case. It seems we need strict prologue/epilogue for __asm__ stat

[Bug target/21535] Empty inline assembly cause the generated code to be wrong?

2005-05-16 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 13:07 --- You say that p.s doesn't work. Could you explain why? The code appears to be functionally identical to q.s, the only difference being that p.s allows the assembler to reorder the code and q.s does not. T

[Bug target/21535] Empty inline assembly cause the generated code to be wrong?

2005-05-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21535