[Bug target/21580] Less-than-ideal code generation for incrementing volatile variables

2007-08-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 00:21 --- >omewhat also related, "(void)x;" still accesses memory when x is volatile -- > I suppose this might be desirable, however. It is because you say to load from x. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2

[Bug target/21580] Less-than-ideal code generation for incrementing volatile variables

2005-05-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 13:03 --- There is another bug about this around somewhere. -- What|Removed |Added Component|

[Bug target/21580] Less-than-ideal code generation for incrementing volatile variables

2005-05-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-15 13:34 --- This is invalid, read the comments in PR 3506 which this is a dup of. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3506 *** -- What|Removed |Added ---