--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23
16:39 ---
Here's a reduced testcase that might be appropriate for the testsuite:
==
/* PR target/21716 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26
08:07 ---
Subject: Bug 21716
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 08:07:36
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog reg-stack.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26
08:55 ---
Subject: Bug 21716
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 08:55:07
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26
09:05 ---
Subject: Bug 21716
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-26 09:05:05
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-26
12:05 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-02
16:05 ---
The testcase from comment #3 still crashes on the 3.4 branch:
ePR21716.c: In function `foo':
ePR21716.c:21: internal compiler error: in subst_stack_regs_pat, at
reg-stack.c:1445
Please submit a full bug r
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-02 16:07
---
Yeah, it is a different bug, one that does not exhibit on the original testcase.
Therefore IMHO a separate PR is needed...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21716
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-02
19:00 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The testcase from comment #3 still crashes on the 3.4 branch:
Please open a new bug.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-11
16:05 ---
The new PR for the problem in comment #3 is PR 22409.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21716
