--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22497
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-09-28 08:14
---
The problem was fixed by the patch for PR 18463:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg01159.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-07-22 09:41
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Oh, I have a local patch which will cause this, woops:
> + if (parts.scale != 1)
> +cost--;
> +
>if (parts.seg != SEG_DEFAULT)
> cost--;
Do you plan to submit this patch
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-18
06:49 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I have tested gcc snapshot 'gcc version 4.1.0 20050716 (experimental)',
> with 'gcc -O2 -ftree-vectorize -msse2' and it still produces code with both %
> eax and %edx used.
>
> A
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-07-18 06:36
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> With last night's compiler I get:
Strange...
I have tested gcc snapshot 'gcc version 4.1.0 20050716 (experimental)',
with 'gcc -O2 -ftree-vectorize -msse2' and it still produces code w
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15
22:18 ---
With last night's compiler I get:
.L2:
movdqa ib(,%eax,8), %xmm0
paddw ic(,%eax,8), %xmm0
movdqa %xmm0, ia(,%eax,8)
addl$2, %eax
cmpl$4, %eax
jne
