[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2010-03-22 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 23:13 --- Subject: Bug 23071 Author: mrs Date: Mon Mar 22 23:13:10 2010 New Revision: 157654 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157654 Log: PR target/23071 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (darwin_rs60

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2010-03-22 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
--- Comment #8 from mikestump at comcast dot net 2010-03-22 23:18 --- The previous behavior was fairly broken, adding packed, _increased_ the alignment. A user that adds packing, never wants more alignment: struct Test { double D __attribute__((packed,aligned(4))); short X; } x;

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2010-03-22 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 23:21 --- This has now been fixed. -- mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2010-03-22 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23071

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 13:21 --- I still don't believe this is a bug. As the alignment of whole struct is still 8 as double is first, even if the alignment of that double is 4. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 14:08 --- The ABI specifies the alignment of the entire record is doubleword if the first field is an FP double, regardless of the alignment of the type itself. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread sabre at nondot dot org
--- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org 2005-07-26 16:25 --- Okay, in that case, how does one change the alignment of the structure? The only way I'm aware of to do this is with attribute packed, but that will also modify the inter-field padding of the structure. For e

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-07-26 16:55 --- The whole point of attribute ((packed)) is to change the ABI. If it can't change the ABI, it is meaningless. So I don't find the argument based on the ABI to be particularly convincing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread dje at watson dot ibm dot com
--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2005-07-26 16:58 --- Subject: Re: Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct If Chris and Apple want to change the behavior for Darwin, be my guest. David -- http://gcc.g

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 17:02 --- reopen -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/23071] Darwin alignment ignores "attribute packed" for first 'double' element of a struct

2005-07-26 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dje at watson dot ibm dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |com |dot org Status|UNCONFIRM