[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

2016-01-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carrot at google dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

2016-01-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-07-01 00:47:09 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

2005-10-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-23 00:05 --- I don't have time to work on this. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

2005-08-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-18 03:48 --- I will be looking into this after working a libjava patch. Note the current asm is: _f: addi r3,r3,1 extsw r3,r3 blr .align 2 .p2align 4,,15 .globl _g _g: