--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23485
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-22
03:07 ---
Subject: Bug 23485
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-22 03:07:44
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/ia64:
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-22 03:44 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-20 15:18 ---
We also need to check divide-by-zero for -minline-int-divide-min-latency and
-minline-int-divide-max-throughput.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23485
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-20 18:33 ---
A patch for inlined calls is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01223.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23485
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-20
23:55 ---
Subject: Bug 23485
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-20 23:55:07
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config/ia64:
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-08-19 18:21 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01172.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23485
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-19
18:26 ---
I don't see why this is a bug really as on some targets (PPC) divide by zero
does not raise any thing and
the result is undefined.
You might want to test your patch's performance as it could cause a lot