--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 06:43 ---
Subject: Bug 24475
Author: uros
Date: Fri Dec 2 06:43:45 2005
New Revision: 107876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107876
Log:
PR target/24475
* lib/target-supports.exp
--- Comment #10 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-12-02 06:59 ---
Fixed on 4.1 and mainline.
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-01 06:52 ---
Subject: Bug 24475
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 1 06:52:11 2005
New Revision: 107804
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=107804
Log:
PR target/24475
* lib/target-supports.exp
--- Comment #6 from uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-11-15 08:13 ---
Perhaps a runtime check should be added to target-supports.exp
( check_effective_target_tls-runtime perhaps) that would check if the system is
capable of running tls enabled binaries. Alternatively, my proposed patch
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-11-15 09:23 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428.c execution test and
gcc.dg/tls/pr24428-2.c execution test fail on IA32
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, uros at kss-loka dot si wrote:
The job of compiler is IMO to compile sources
--
uros at kss-loka dot si changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|uros at kss-loka dot si |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Comment #5 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-15 01:57 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Do you think there are enough people with prehistoric libcs building
new GCC to bother with it though?
If someone wanted to do the work in the .exp files, I wouldn't be opposed.
But I also
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-11-12 14:24 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428.c execution test and
gcc.dg/tls/pr24428-2.c execution test fail on IA32
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Does even a trivial __thread using program break
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-10 09:49 ---
glibc can be configured without tls support when using --without-tls configure
switch. I think glibc 2.3.2 defaulted to --without-tls, so you had to
explicitly request --with-tls support.
Does even a trivial
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 16:31 ---
Works just fine here. What glibc are you using?
pr24428.c and pr24428-2.c are the only dg-do run tls tests, so perhaps
your libc doesn't support TLS at all?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24475
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-11-09 18:09 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/tls/pr24428.c execution test and
gcc.dg/tls/pr24428-2.c execution test fail on IA32
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Works just fine here. What glibc are you using?
11 matches
Mail list logo
