--- Comment #6 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 16:22
---
Tested patch in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00113.html
--
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 23:06
---
Subject: Bug 24600
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Nov 2 23:06:26 2005
New Revision: 106404
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=106404
Log:
ChangeLog:
PR target/24600
* loop.c
--- Comment #8 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-02 23:09
---
Fixed.
--
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 13:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=10098)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10098action=view)
reduced testcase
testcase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24600
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 13:01 ---
Critical, as this happens in a lot of packages.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24600
--- Comment #4 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 21:53
---
This is a bug in the old loop optimizer introduced by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg00690.html
The problem with this patch is that it assumes
gen_move_insn where the source is a PLUS representing
--- Comment #5 from uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 21:54
---
Created an attachment (id=10106)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10106action=view)
Possible fix (not yet tested)
This patch is a possible fix to the problem;
it works by using force_operand to
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 21:40 ---
Whoops, s390, not s390x.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC
