[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2007-02-03 Thread gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-03 16:06 --- Fixed in GCC-4.1.1. -- gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-03-10 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25218

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-02-22 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #9 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-02-22 14:08 --- Added Jan Hubicka, since he seems the original author of the code that fails (hope I get it right this time) and might have an idea on how to fix this in time for 4.0.3 -- jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-02-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-02-20 16:13 --- #4 0x006714fb in compensate_edge (e=0x2a959776c0, file=0x0) at /scratch/vondele/gcc_40_branch/gcc/gcc/reg-stack.c:2795 this assert was last modified by nathan (from svn ann, revision 87244), who seems to be

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-02-20 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-20 16:24 --- I'm guessing my change was in converting an if () abort () into gcc_assert, and not directly to blame for whatever's happening here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25218

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-02-20 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #8 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-02-20 16:32 --- (In reply to comment #7) I'm guessing my change was in converting an if () abort () into gcc_assert, and not directly to blame for whatever's happening here. Looks like you're right... I must have been reading too

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-02-19 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #5 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-02-20 07:59 --- (In reply to comment #4) ICE on valid; P1. Still present with 'gcc version 4.0.3 20060219 (prerelease)': gcc -c -m32 -O3 test.c test.c: In function ‘drotmg’: test.c:20: internal compiler error: in compensate_edge, at

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-01-15 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-15 22:54 --- ICE on valid; P1. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2006-01-03 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-01-03 09:42 --- (In reply to comment #2) I really mean, -O3 -m32 -fno-unswitch-loops -fno-tree-dominator-opts fails in 4.0.3 but passes in 4.1.0 or 4.2.0. Still getting: /scratch/vondele/gcc_40_branch/build/bin/gcc -O3 -m32

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2005-12-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 15:26 --- There are two different bugs here. The first one is only a 4.0 regresssion and that is a target bug as -O2 on 4.0.3 fails but it does not for 4.1.0. The second one how ever is 4.1/4.2 regression and is a generic

[Bug target/25218] [4.0 Regression] ICE : in compensate_edge, at reg-stack.c:2795

2005-12-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-02 15:28 --- I really mean, -O3 -m32 -fno-unswitch-loops -fno-tree-dominator-opts fails in 4.0.3 but passes in 4.1.0 or 4.2.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25218