--- Comment #6 from langton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-30 16:46 ---
This is fixed in 4.2 as of revision 115079. I'll backport the fix to 4.1 in
the next few days:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg01492.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25765
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-30 18:40 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
This is fixed in 4.2 as of revision 115079. I'll backport the fix to 4.1 in
the next few days:
4.1 does not support that much of x86-darwin anyways. So closing as fixed.
--
pinskia
--- Comment #4 from langton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 20:13 ---
The rs6000 patch (attached) does appear to work, at least on assign_2.f90.
I'll do a full bootstrap and regression-test, then submit the fix.
--
langton at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #5 from langton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-27 20:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=11761)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11761action=view)
Geoffrey Keating's rs6000 patch applied to i386.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25765
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 17:23 ---
*** Bug 27183 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-12 04:13 ---
A patch like the rs6000 one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02517.html
Should work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25765
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-28 04:09 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
