[Bug target/25871] TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE uses 32bit moves on 64bit code

2006-05-02 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 13:02 --- Fixed on mainline. -- rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added S

[Bug target/25871] TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE uses 32bit moves on 64bit code

2006-05-02 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-02 12:57 --- Subject: Bug 25871 Author: rsandifo Date: Tue May 2 12:57:52 2006 New Revision: 113460 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113460 Log: 2006-05-02 Joshua Kinard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug target/25871] TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE uses 32bit moves on 64bit code

2006-04-28 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 22:36 --- The patch looks good to me, thanks, and should be small enough to avoid the need for a copyright assignment. I'll apply it next week. -- rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/25871] TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE uses 32bit moves on 64bit code

2006-04-26 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 08:40 --- Subject: Bug 25871 Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Apr 26 08:40:26 2006 New Revision: 113273 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113273 Log: From Bugzilla: 2006-04-26 Joshua Kinard <[EMAIL

[Bug target/25871] TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE uses 32bit moves on 64bit code

2006-04-26 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 08:39 --- Subject: Bug 25871 Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Apr 26 08:38:58 2006 New Revision: 113272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113272 Log: From Bugzilla: 2006-04-26 Joshua Kinard <[EMAIL

[Bug target/25871] TRAMPOLINE_TEMPLATE uses 32bit moves on 64bit code

2006-01-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-20 14:10 --- Conifmred but this is actually not a regression from any versions of GCC (after the EGCS split) that I can tell from as the source has not changed that much. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: