[Bug target/25998] executable generated by f951 doesn't work with 32-bit SUNW,UltraAX-e2 (UltraSPARC-IIe) shared libc_psr.so.1

2006-01-27 Thread alex at milivojevic dot org
--- Comment #1 from alex at milivojevic dot org 2006-01-27 17:11 --- Created an attachment (id=10743) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10743action=view) test program -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25998

[Bug target/25998] executable generated by f951 doesn't work with 32-bit SUNW,UltraAX-e2 (UltraSPARC-IIe) shared libc_psr.so.1

2006-01-27 Thread alex at milivojevic dot org
--- Comment #3 from alex at milivojevic dot org 2006-01-27 17:26 --- I said it might be a bug with gcc. After all, gcc is the only application that doesn't work correctly on this box. I guess maintainers of any other component mentioned (gmp, mpfr, binutils, Sun) can say the same

[Bug target/25998] executable generated by f951 doesn't work with 32-bit SUNW,UltraAX-e2 (UltraSPARC-IIe) shared libc_psr.so.1

2006-01-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 17:15 --- Why do you think this is a GCC bug? libc_psr is linked in via black magic and not really referenced in the binaries see: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2003-08/msg00343.html --

[Bug target/25998] executable generated by f951 doesn't work with 32-bit SUNW,UltraAX-e2 (UltraSPARC-IIe) shared libc_psr.so.1

2006-01-27 Thread alex at milivojevic dot org
--- Comment #4 from alex at milivojevic dot org 2006-01-27 19:34 --- Some additional info (there's always something else that pops up). Seems the problem is present only on machine where both of the following are true: - processor is UltraSPARC-IIe - uname -i returns SUNW,UltraAX-e2