--- Comment #11 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-12 16:57 ---
Fixed for 4.1.1.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-12 16:56 ---
Subject: Bug 26532
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Mar 12 16:56:08 2006
New Revision: 111979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111979
Log:
2006-03-12 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR targe
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26532
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-06 18:06 ---
Subject: Bug 26532
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Mar 6 18:06:47 2006
New Revision: 111789
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111789
Log:
2006-03-06 Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR target
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-06 13:17 ---
Working on it.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-03-05 20:18 ---
In yet other terms: I could easily apply the attached, without affecting the
functionality of the library and binary compatibility. No, we don't want to
export that symbol and the real reason of the link failure on those ta
