--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-04-18 14:07 ---
pinskia: You're right in some sense but, shudder, this will make things
slw.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-18 16:15 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> pinskia: You're right in some sense but, shudder, this will make things
> slw.
No it will not. I and others have sped up the HWI being 64bit case as
PPC-darwin was 32bit until the 64
--- Comment #8 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-11 17:22 ---
Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00472.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26600
--- Comment #9 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-14 14:23 ---
Please take bugs if you post patches for them, it makes it easier to search for
bugs that nobody is looking at.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-16 04:17 ---
Subject: Bug 26600
Author: sayle
Date: Tue May 16 04:16:00 2006
New Revision: 113818
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113818
Log:
PR target/26600
* config/i386/i386.c (legitimat
--- Comment #11 from sayle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-17 01:12 ---
Subject: Bug 26600
Author: sayle
Date: Wed May 17 01:11:59 2006
New Revision: 113839
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113839
Log:
PR target/26600
* config/i386/i386.c (legitimat
--- Comment #12 from roger at eyesopen dot com 2006-05-18 01:50 ---
This is now fixed on both mainline and the 4.1 branch.
--
roger at eyesopen dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 10:18 ---
For mainline, this is a dup of 26449. For 4.1.0 I can reproduce this:
#1 0x08493eae in push_reload (in=0x4023a4b8, out=0x40241280,
inloc=0x40244a84, outloc=0x40229be0, class=NO_REGS, inmode=V4SImode,
out
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 10:40 ---
(gdb) call debug_rtx(*outloc)
(subreg:TI (reg:V4SI 23 xmm2 [99]) 0)
(but of course it looks like NO_REGS doesn't make any sense for this reload)
(gdb) up
#2 0x0849b343 in find_reloads (insn=0x402401b8, replace=0,
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-08 12:39 ---
So it looks like this is HWI bug really, if a target needs to support TImode in
any shape or form, HWI should be set to 64bits no questions asked.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|R
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-26 13:13
---
Shorter testcase (compile with "gcc -O -ftree-vectorize -msse2"):
void foo(int *p, int N)
{
int i;
for (i=0; i<8; ++i, ++p)
{
int j = N+2*(N
12 matches
Mail list logo
