--- Comment #15 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-07 15:38 ---
4.1 is not supported anymore.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-04-01 17:07 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
As you can see from the backtrace, the problem is in gcc/java/jcf-io.c at
line number 394 where we make a call to scandir(). I'm not an alpha-linux
hacker, but I see that there's
--- Comment #12 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-31 18:14 ---
Finally i produce the information that you ask me with the your precious
indication and that is :
GNU gdb 6.4
Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public
--- Comment #13 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-01 07:57
---
As you can see from the backtrace, the problem is in gcc/java/jcf-io.c at
line number 394 where we make a call to scandir(). I'm not an alpha-linux
hacker, but I see that there's scandir64 and dirent64 and it
--- Comment #6 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-30 08:19 ---
Now run debugx jc1 rest-of-command-line, where rest-of-command-line
was the entire command noted earlier that causes the failure.
Before i reproduce the error, after i make the command :
debugx jcl
--- Comment #7 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 13:07 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Now run debugx jc1 rest-of-command-line, where rest-of-command-line
was the entire command noted earlier that causes the failure.
Before i reproduce the error, after i make the command
--- Comment #8 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-30 19:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=11169)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11169action=view)
The Gcc Build Log
It's My build log...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26879
--- Comment #9 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-30 19:31 ---
Hello Mathew,
i have tried to perform your indications, but without success; with a lot of
probability because of my little competence in matter. I would pray you,
considering that I have posted the build complete
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 22:18
---
*** Bug 26878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26879
--- Comment #11 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-31 04:29
---
Created an attachment (id=11172)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11172action=view)
Shell script to help narrow the problem in PR26879.
Save this file in a folder. Save debugx and debug from:
--- Comment #3 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-29 08:17 ---
Premising that I have unloaded the last available snapshots on the site and
that is:
gcc-4.2-20060325.tar.bz2,gcc-4.1-20060324.tar.bz2,gcc-4.0-20060323.tar.bz2
Well i make two test yesterday with this result :
First
--- Comment #4 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-29 10:06 ---
It would be difficult for those of us without alpha-linux boxes to track
this problem down. If you're willing, you can try to track the failure
to a certain bit yourself.
Let's stick with the GCC 4.2 snapshot as
--- Comment #5 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-29 10:30 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
OK now i try this and after i tell you the resul, hoping in the lucky :-)
Thanks
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26879
--- Comment #1 from rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-28 09:24 ---
This looks like a duplicate of 26878 except for the listed patches and the
actual error message. Both have been filed by the same person.
Claudio: Can you try with a recent snapshot from the mainline SVN
--- Comment #2 from zerocool at modemsoft dot it 2006-03-28 11:00 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This looks like a duplicate of 26878 except for the listed patches and the
actual error message. Both have been filed by the same person.
Yes , but i try with different version : 4.03
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
Component|java|target
GCC
16 matches
Mail list logo
