[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-10-19 Thread likewise at gmx dot net
--- Comment #18 from likewise at gmx dot net 2006-10-19 22:01 --- Created an attachment (id=12464) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12464&action=view) Fix. Copied from http://www.freaknet.org/martin/crosstool/patches/gcc-4.1.1/gcc-4.1.1-bugfix-27363.patch so that it l

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2007-01-25 Thread m dot k dot edwards at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19 from m dot k dot edwards at gmail dot com 2007-01-26 02:53 --- Still generates bad code for snd_mask_refine in the gcc-4.1-20070115 snapshot. I have verified that the patch claimed to fix this bug is in this snapshot. My gcc is tuned for arm-926ejs, old ABI. -O1 works

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-04-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 05:01 --- We really need a self contianed example but I think this was already fixed for 4.1.1. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-04-29 Thread yfw dot debian at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-04-30 05:09 --- Subject: Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug Hi pinskia, I tried to make a simple test example for this bug. But If I put the code from ALSA subsystem of Linux kernel to a test.c file, the gcc will product correct a

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-04-29 Thread yfw dot debian at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-04-30 05:32 --- Where can I get gcc 4.1.1? From the ftp site, the latest gcc 4.1 release is 4.1.0. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-04-30 Thread yfw dot debian at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-04-30 09:09 --- I tried the gcc 4.1.1 snapshot 20060421. The bug still there. The assembly code producted with -Os option is the same as gcc 4.1.0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-05-14 Thread s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk
--- Comment #5 from s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk 2006-05-14 17:15 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I tried the gcc 4.1.1 snapshot 20060421. The bug still there. The assembly > code > producted with -Os option is the same as gcc 4.1.0. > Have you got anywhere with this? I wonder

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-06-07 Thread dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #6 from dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com 2006-06-07 15:52 --- Created an attachment (id=11628) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11628&action=view) .i file of pcm_native.c and .s files for -Os, -O1 and -O2 Attached the .i and .s for -Os & -O2 (failing

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-06-12 Thread dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #7 from dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com 2006-06-12 15:34 --- Until a fix for this bug is found, there are two possible workarounds: - Compile kernels sound system as modules and compile these modules with -O1 instead of default -Os or -O2 (e.g. by changing main Makefi

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-06-26 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 18:54 --- One thing we have is some extra virtual operands from CCP: before: : mask_5 = &old; v_7 = mask_6; # SFT.2_33 = V_MAY_DEF ; *mask_5 = *v_7; mask_8 = mask_6; v_10 = v_9; i_11 = 0; goto (); after: : mask_5 = &o

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-15 Thread enrico dot scholz at informatik dot tu-chemnitz dot de
--- Comment #9 from enrico dot scholz at informatik dot tu-chemnitz dot de 2006-07-15 19:22 --- *** Bug 28362 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- enrico dot scholz at informatik dot tu-chemnitz dot de changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-15 Thread enrico dot scholz at informatik dot tu-chemnitz dot de
--- Comment #10 from enrico dot scholz at informatik dot tu-chemnitz dot de 2006-07-15 19:26 --- Bug #28362 contains a self contained example. Basically, it needs only | some_struct = *some_other_struct; to trigger this bug. I wonder for how much other segfaults/brokeness this bug is

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-18 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-18 21:42 --- I'm working on this. Looks like a CSE bug. -- pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-20 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 13:57 --- Subject: Bug 27363 Author: pbrook Date: Thu Jul 20 13:57:31 2006 New Revision: 115614 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115614 Log: 2006-07-20 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR 27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-20 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 13:59 --- Subject: Bug 27363 Author: pbrook Date: Thu Jul 20 13:59:22 2006 New Revision: 115616 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115616 Log: Backport from mainline. PR 27363 gcc/

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-20 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 15:07 --- Subject: Bug 27363 Author: pbrook Date: Thu Jul 20 15:07:25 2006 New Revision: 115620 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115620 Log: 2006-07-20 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Backport

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-20 Thread pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-20 15:08 --- FIxed. -- pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-20 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-20 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-21 Thread yfw dot debian at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-07-22 06:21 --- Col. pbrook. I will try the latest gcc snapshot. Thanks a lot. Regards Yin, Fengwei -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27363

[Bug target/27363] ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug

2006-07-21 Thread dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #17 from dirk dot behme at googlemail dot com 2006-07-22 06:24 --- Subject: Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug yfw dot debian at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #16 from yfw dot debian at gmail dot com 2006-07-22 06:21 > --- > Col. pbrook. > I will try the l