[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2008-02-01 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #27 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:53 --- 4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-12-27 Thread ojab at ojab dot ru
--- Comment #25 from ojab at ojab dot ru 2007-12-27 17:17 --- Is it any progress? -- ojab at ojab dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-12-27 Thread tschwinge at gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from tschwinge at gnu dot org 2007-12-27 18:23 --- Here is what I proposed / asked: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00289.html Unfortunately I didn't get a definitive answer. I did not yet start to implement the ideas I described. I don't know if such a patch

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-11-04 Thread samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org
--- Comment #24 from samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 2007-11-04 16:42 --- It's rather the converse: Linux is much like Hurd, since they're both GNU-based, so quite logically they should share most of the configuration stuff. --

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-09 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:22 --- Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #20 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-01 11:55 --- Tripping exactly this while thinking about uclibc on hurd. To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included and gnu.h should be made uclibc-aware.. -- aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread ams at gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org 2007-10-01 18:04 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included It should be included. and gnu.h should be made uclibc-aware.. This would be

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread Andrew Pinski
On 1 Oct 2007 18:04:09 -, ams at gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org 2007-10-01 18:04 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included It

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-01 18:36 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared On 1 Oct 2007 18:04:09 -, ams at gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-07-19 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

2007-05-14 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:28 --- Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1. -- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added