[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-09-20 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183

[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-09-10 Thread jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183

[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-08-07 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:13 --- Sorry, wrong bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183

[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-08-07 Thread schwab at suse dot de
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-07 23:12 --- The removed comment says: - /* If will do cse, generate all results into pseudo registers - since 1) that allows cse to find more things - and 2) otherwise cse could produce an insn the machine - cannot support.

[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-06-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-28 11:15 --- (In reply to comment #2) That would almost mean as is being miscompiled on m68k. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-06-27 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-27 22:21 --- What I said about binutils might be wrong. It seems it's not due to a difference in the version, but due to one being native and one being cross. I just upgraded the binutils-m68k on i386 to the same version as that on m68k

[Bug target/28183] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] assembler error "FATAL: can't close x.o" on m68k with new binutils

2006-06-27 Thread tbm at cyrius dot com
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-06-27 22:08 --- Created an attachment (id=11766) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11766&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28183