--- Comment #10 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-04 01:49 ---
This is the same bug as PR 28490. I verified that my prototype patch for PR
28490 fixes it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 28490 ***
--
wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28495
--- Comment #9 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-07-29 11:05 ---
At least we know that the bug is also present in 4.0.
--
schwab at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-29 10:32 ---
Zdenek's patch also can't be responsible for this. He probably also just
uncovered latent bugs.
Instead of pointing at random patches, it would be much more helpful to analyze
what is going wrong. For this kind of p
--- Comment #7 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-07-29 09:34 ---
Broken by r90624. Reproduced with -O -floop-optimize2 -fmove-loop-invariants.
2004-11-14 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tree-optimization/18431
* tree-flow.h (stmt_references_memory_p): Declare.
--- Comment #6 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-27 08:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=11955)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11955&action=view)
test case
Testcase from application "ickle".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28495
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-26 21:54 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Broken since r111459:
That would mean it was a latent bug. In fact you can most likely reproduce the
failure with -fno-loop-optimize.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-07-26 21:47 ---
Broken since r111459:
2006-02-26 Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* common.opt (-floop-optimize, -frerun-loop-opt): Remove.
* tree-pass.h (pass_loop_optimize): Remove.
* passes.c (pass_loop_opti
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-26 16:36 ---
This bug got introduced between 20051122 and 20060218.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28495
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-26 16:30 ---
Huh, the testcase fails at -O but works at -O2. (But the original sources
failed at -O2).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28495
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-07-26 16:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=11948)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11948&action=view)
test case
Testcase from application "xstow".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28495
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |target
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http:/
12 matches
Mail list logo