--- Comment #9 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-10-03 17:42 ---
I submitted a patch for this defect,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg01108.html
however the failure seems to have gone away even without applying this patch.
I think (but did not verify) that this patch went
--- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 22:55 ---
IIRC my change can cause entries to be present into the hash table that
wouldn't have been there before. However this should be harmless. I don't have
any helpful suggestons why this is broken.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28604
--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-09-20 21:23 ---
This bug is weird. If I remove the code in cse_insn where the dest_addr_elt
field is used, I still get the bug. So the problem occurs when creating the
dest_addr_elt data, not when using it. This makes no sense to me,
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-09-11 20:39 ---
It looks like this failure was introduced with r115620.
+2006-07-20 Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+ Backport from mainline.
+ PR 27363
+ * cse.c (cse_insn): Add destination addresses to hash table
--- Comment #5 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-09-11 17:12 ---
I will see if I can find the checkin on the 4.1 branch that caused the failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28604
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 16:19 ---
Sorry, I don't have an ia64 system on which to try wrong-code tests.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28604
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-09 13:06 ---
Janis, could you do a binary search? On 4.1 branch the bug was not in r115546,
and was there in r115639.
Thanks.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-09 13:05 ---
Janis, could you do a binary search? On 4.1 branch the bug was not in r115546,
and was there in r115639.
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28604
--- Comment #1 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-07 14:38 ---
This bug appeared on 4.1 branch between 20060718 (revision 115546) and 20060721
(revision 115639), so a regression.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
10 matches
Mail list logo