--- Comment #9 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 15:45
---
Subject: Bug 29413
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Oct 19 15:45:46 2006
New Revision: 117886
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117886
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline:
2006-10-17
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-17 07:10
---
Fixed in trunk. Because the patch is simple and fairly obvious,
I used the leeway given target maintainers to fix the bug for 4.2,
even though it isn't a regression. However, because it's not a
regression, I don'
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 14:11 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > %{G*} %{EB:-meb} %{EL:-mel} %{EB:%{EL:%emay not use both -EB and -EL}} \
>
> Shouldn't the combination of both -EB and -EL be legal that is later options
> override preceeding ones just
--- Comment #6 from ralf at linux-mips dot org 2006-10-12 13:33 ---
> %{G*} %{EB:-meb} %{EL:-mel} %{EB:%{EL:%emay not use both -EB and -EL}} \
Shouldn't the combination of both -EB and -EL be legal that is later options
override preceeding ones just like with other -ffoo / -fno-foo opti
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 07:33 ---
*** Bug 23824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
