--- Comment #18 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 23:12
---
Subject: Bug 29746
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Feb 6 23:12:35 2007
New Revision: 121671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121671
Log:
PR target/29746
* config/sh/sh.c
--- Comment #19 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 23:29
---
Fixed.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-01-07 00:10 ---
Subject: Bug number PR target/29746
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg00494.html
--
--- Comment #16 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 11:08
---
I'm testing the new softfp patch with bootstrap on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
It isn't finished yet but already passes the compilation of ifcvt.c
at stage2. No new failures on the regtest for x86 cross sh4-linux.
--- Comment #14 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 15:48
---
Created an attachment (id=12587)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12587action=view)
testsuite patch
This patch is needed additionally for the patch from #11.
--
--- Comment #15 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 17:26
---
Created an attachment (id=12589)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12589action=view)
current softfp patch
I've been able to reproduce the 'does not satisfy contraint' ICE using
-O2 xxx.i -w
--- Comment #9 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 16:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=12576)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12576action=view)
Amended sched-deps.c patch
It occurend to me that the previous patch would not do the right thing when
the set
--- Comment #10 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 16:33
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I don't see ICEs for the tls tests on my sh-elf build with
your patches in #6 and #7. Does the new patch in #7 fix them?
Yes, but I am still seeing these changes:
FAIL:
--- Comment #11 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 17:28
---
Created an attachment (id=12580)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12580action=view)
current software floating point patch
I am testing this patch now.
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 17:37
---
(In reply to comment #8)
I don't see ICEs for the tls tests on my sh-elf build with
your patches in #6 and #7. Does the new patch in #7 fix them?
I've confirmed that the trunk bootstraps successfully with
--- Comment #13 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-09 22:42
---
I've tested the patch in #9 with the trunk (rev. 118619) and
got the same ICE in #2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29746
--- Comment #8 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-08 23:53 ---
I don't see ICEs for the tls tests on my sh-elf build with
your patches in #6 and #7. Does the new patch in #7 fix them?
I've confirmed that the trunk bootstraps successfully with
the patch in #4 and a one-liner
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 15:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=12563)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12563action=view)
current patch for software floating point
In the framework of the software floating point patches, I make the
--- Comment #7 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 17:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12564)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12564action=view)
I have a new patch for sched-deps.c now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29746
--- Comment #1 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 02:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=12556)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12556action=view)
a reduced test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29746
--- Comment #2 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 02:37 ---
I've attached a reduced test case which fails also on the cross compiler
with -O2:
foo.c:69: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
(insn 232 235 233 9 (set (reg:SI 147 t)
(eq:SI (reg:SI 8 r8
--- Comment #3 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 02:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=12558)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12558action=view)
a reduced test case for the spill failure
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29746
--- Comment #4 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 02:40 ---
If the comparison with a constant is removed from cbranchdi4_i,
the 2nd test case and the original ifcvt.c are compiled successfully.
--- ORIG/trunk/gcc/config/sh/sh.md 2006-11-05 10:02:45.0 +0900
+++
--- Comment #5 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 02:46 ---
I'd like to add Joern to the list.
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
19 matches
Mail list logo
