[Bug target/30517] Inefficient address calculation on i386

2014-11-08 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30517 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/30517] Inefficient address calculation on i386

2007-01-23 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #3 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2007-01-23 23:36 --- If they are the same size (and there is no speed impact), there is actually no point to expect that they should compile to the same thing. Of course; I meant that they're the same size at the moment. The optimal

[Bug target/30517] Inefficient address calculation on i386

2007-01-21 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-01-21 11:38 --- (In reply to comment #0) gcc with -Os -fno-PIC generates: movb$38, (%ebx,%edx)# 45*movqi_1/7 [length = 4] leal(%ebx,%edx), %eax # 122 *lea_1 [length = 3] movb

[Bug target/30517] Inefficient address calculation on i386

2007-01-21 Thread astrange at ithinksw dot com
--- Comment #2 from astrange at ithinksw dot com 2007-01-21 19:25 --- Created an attachment (id=12928) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12928action=view) example source code Had a bit of browser trouble; here's the code. --