--- Comment #9 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-03-28 08:43 ---
Hi Jeff,
Thanks - I have checked the patch in.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
--- Comment #10 from nickc at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-28 08:43 ---
Subject: Bug 31110
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Mar 28 08:42:36 2008
New Revision: 133675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133675
Log:
PR target/31110
* config/mn10300/mn10300.c
--- Comment #11 from mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com 2008-03-28
08:54 ---
Can the patch be applied to the 4.3 branch too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
--- Comment #12 from nickc at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-28 09:30 ---
Subject: Bug 31110
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Mar 28 09:30:05 2008
New Revision: 133676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133676
Log:
PR target/31110
* config/mn10300/mn10300.c
--- Comment #13 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-03-28 09:31 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
Hi Mike,
Can the patch be applied to the 4.3 branch too?
Done.
Cheers
Nick
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
--- Comment #14 from mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com 2008-03-28
10:31 ---
Fixed :)
--
mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-03-27 08:26 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
Hi Jeff,
The CLASS is DATA_OR_EXTENDED_REGS.
(plus:SI (reg/f:SI 9 sp)
(const_int 1100 [0x44c]))
Hmm, so why isn't this caught by this code in
--- Comment #8 from law at redhat dot com 2008-03-27 18:57 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
Nope, when you pointed it out to me I puzzled over it too. The answer
is quite simple though, at the point where
--- Comment #5 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-03-26 14:16 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
Hi Jeff,
What does CLASS, MODE and IN look like?
Err, presumably you are talking about these values when
default_secondary_reload() triggers the abort ?
The
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2008-03-27 00:35 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
--- Comment #5 from nickc at redhat dot com 2008-03-26 14:16 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
--- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2008-03-25 21:54 ---
Subject: Re: Problem while compiling gcc for mn10300-elf
mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #3 from mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com 2008-03-20
13:55 ---
patch:
--- Comment #3 from mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com 2008-03-20
13:55 ---
patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg01458.html
--
mstein dot lists at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from rask at sygehus dot dk 2007-06-09 11:02 ---
It is still broken as of revision 125570.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
--- Comment #1 from mstein at phenix dot rootshell dot be 2007-03-09 18:16
---
Created an attachment (id=13182)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13182action=view)
from SVN revision: 122728
Commandline used to create ldtoa.i:
14 matches
Mail list logo
