--- Comment #18 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:09 ---
Fixed for 4.3.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #17 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 17:07 ---
Subject: Bug 32462
Author: ro
Date: Mon Jul 16 17:07:25 2007
New Revision: 126684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126684
Log:
PR target/32462
PR libgcj/32465
* class.c (hid
--- Comment #16 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-07-12
17:30 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> #ifdef HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN is fine. There is no real bad consequence to not
> hiding
> those sym
--- Comment #15 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 17:27 ---
#ifdef HAVE_GAS_HIDDEN is fine. There is no real bad consequence to not hiding
those symbols; it's just that the DSO exports a lot of unnecessary junk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32462
--- Comment #14 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-07-12
17:16 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
pinskia at gmail dot com writes:
> This is way too conservative, see PR 26989 for the reasons why?
But how do you propose to hand
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-07-12 15:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
On 12 Jul 2007 14:15:06 -, ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> static void
> -hide (tree decl)
> -{
> +hide (t
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 14:34 ---
You should probably bootstrap. Post the patch to the list.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32462
--- Comment #11 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 14:26 ---
Mine.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc d
--- Comment #10 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-07-12
14:15 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> --- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 10:49 ---
> This is somewha
--- Comment #9 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 10:49 ---
This is somewhat bewildering: if the visibility attribute is not supported, who
does setting the visibility make any difference to the build?
Nonetheless, I have no objection to something like
static void
hide (tree de
--- Comment #8 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 10:18 ---
I've now identified the patch that caused this regression:
2007-04-03 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* jvgenmain.c (main): Change main to use class$, not class$$.
(do_mangle_classname): Likewise.
--- Comment #7 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-07-09
17:48 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> So, the question is why the linker is complaining that "a GOT relative
> relocation must refere
--- Comment #6 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 10:36 ---
_ZN4java4lang12PosixProcess9queueLockE is defined in the assembly source:
.globl _ZN4java4lang12PosixProcess9queueLockE
.bss
.align 4
.type _ZN4java4lang12PosixProcess9queueLockE, @object
--- Comment #5 from ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2007-07-03
17:57 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] Linking libgcj.so fails on Solaris 10/x86
I compared the assembler files corresponding to java/.libs/process-Posix.o
and built with both gcj 4.2.1 20070611 and 4.3.0 20070618
--- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 17:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=13838)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13838&action=view)
process-Posix.s built with gcj 4.3.0 20070618
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32462
--- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 17:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=13837)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13837&action=view)
process-Posix.s built with gcj 4.2.1 20070611
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32462
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #2 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-29 18:26 ---
Correction: this is a regression in 4.3.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
18 matches
Mail list logo
