[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-16 14:54 --- The failure is gone, but the cause might just be hidden again (the IL generated for the realloc looks safe, even with the malloc attribute set). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 06:57 --- Assigning this bug to myself, since it seems I caused it. -- jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 21:33 --- Subject: Bug 32748 Author: jb Date: Sun Jul 15 21:33:32 2007 New Revision: 126662 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126662 Log: 2007-07-16 Janne Blomqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR fortran/32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-15 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-15 21:35 --- With the 126662 commit, this should now be fixed, closing. -- jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-14 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-14 15:12 --- (In reply to comment #6) revision 126263 is bad. This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00165.html is the cause. I meant to say revision 126263 works. --

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 14:50 --- revision 126200 works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #2 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 18:53 --- revision 126240 works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 20:03 --- revision 126260 works. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 20:50 --- revision 126271 is bad. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 22:39 --- revision 126264 is bad. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32748

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-13 22:59 --- revision 126263 is bad. This patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00165.html is the cause. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/32748] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_6.f90

2007-07-12 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1