--- Comment #9 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-28 01:25 ---
Fixed in gcc 4.3.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-28 01:20 ---
Subject: Bug 34001
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Nov 28 01:20:34 2007
New Revision: 130488
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130488
Log:
2007-11-27 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joey Ye <[EMAIL
--- Comment #7 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-27 02:36 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> We have changed fastcall behavior from gcc 3.4 to 4.1. For
>
> ---
> #define FASTCALL __attribute((fastcall))
>
> double FASTCALL f_dii( double p1d, int p2i, int p3i ){ return p1d +
> (double)p2
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-26 23:19 ---
We have changed fastcall behavior from gcc 3.4 to 4.1. For
---
#define FASTCALL __attribute((fastcall))
double FASTCALL f_dii( double p1d, int p2i, int p3i ){ return p1d +
(double)p2
i + (double)p3i; }
inttest_x;
int
--- Comment #5 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-16 04:52 ---
The correct patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg00885.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34001
--- Comment #4 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 03:27 ---
>From "info gcc",
`fastcall'
On the Intel 386, the `fastcall' attribute causes the compiler to
pass the first argument (if of integral type) in the register ECX
^^^
